Benjamin,
Walter. Trans. Harry Zohn. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical
Reproduction.
Web. 8 Sep. 2015. <https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm>
This article
considers how the physical presence of a work of art is categorically different
than the presence of a reproduction. The copy exists unattached to the
physicality of the original object, unattached to its specific relationship to
space and time. This disconnection, motivated by a need for democratic access
to objects across space, results in disenchantment, a loss of the “aura” which
belongs solely to the original. Film has this disenchantment built into it,
Benjamin elaborates. By involving a mechanical device from the start, those
portrayed are, even while in the act, disconnected by experience from the
result. It has no connection to their life as experienced first-hand. In
addition, the capabilities of the eye of the camera open up entirely new fields
of perception. We see things in ways impossible to the human eye. Time stops,
space takes on new proportions, new angles. At the same time, it opens up a new
field of appreciation in which the viewer is put in the privileged position of
heightened awareness by the camera’s viewpoint. It represents a prepared general
reality which requires nothing of the particular viewer. This is a far cry from
a painting, which is a solitary window into the mind of another, not tailor-fit
to the perceptual powers of the mass.
No comments:
Post a Comment